Share.

11 Comments

  1. username_elephant on

    Both of these correlate with being cis-male. Does the effect disappear when you control for sex ratio?

  2. This data isn’t beautiful. I would in fact say the presentation of this data is rather ugly and confusing.

  3. Why are all the web search data points on the 5’s (35/45/55/65/75/85/95)? Was the data bucketed, and then used the midpoint in each bucket?

  4. Cagy_Cephalopod on

    Looks like your data sources (such as they are) contain data from all states. Why did you choose to exclude some?

  5. Correlation between support for Trump and people who want to better please their partner(s)

  6. seems i accidentally left some states out, here’s the data set:

    Alabama: (85, 64.5)
    Alaska: (35, 53.7)
    Arizona: (65, 52.3)
    Arkansas: (75, 64.2)
    California: (55, 33.5)
    Colorado: (55, 41.1)
    Connecticut: (45, 39.9)
    Delaware: (35, 40.8)
    Florida: (55, 56.2)
    Georgia: (85, 50.7)
    Hawaii: (35, 29.1)
    Idaho: (35, 66.0)
    Illinois: (65, 41.9)
    Indiana: (75, 58.1)
    Iowa: (55, 55.3)
    Kansas: (65, 56.7)
    Kentucky: (85, 62.0)
    Louisiana: (75, 61.9)
    Maine: (35, 45.8)
    Maryland: (45, 33.6)
    Massachusetts: (35, 32.3)
    Michigan: (55, 49.6)
    Minnesota: (55, 46.4)
    Mississippi: (95, 60.4)
    Missouri: (65, 60.8)
    Montana: (35, 60.5)
    Nebraska: (35, 60.2)
    Nevada: (65, 50.6)
    New Hampshire: (35, 47.0)
    New Jersey: (45, 43.9)
    New Mexico: (75, 45.2)
    New York: (35, 36.1)
    North Carolina: (65, 51.1)
    North Dakota: (35, 65.2)
    Ohio: (55, 56.9)
    Oklahoma: (75, 68.9)
    Oregon: (55, 40.9)
    Pennsylvania: (45, 50.5)
    Rhode Island: (45, 39.0)
    South Carolina: (75, 57.7)
    South Dakota: (35, 63.4)
    Tennessee: (75, 64.5)
    Texas: (75, 55.7)
    Utah: (55, 55.9)
    Vermont: (35, 32.5)
    Virginia: (45, 47.6)
    Washington: (45, 38.7)
    West Virginia: (85, 68.1)
    Wisconsin: (55, 49.7)
    Wyoming: (35, 70.4)