Usual stuff with any protest really. I can see where the protest is coming from, I completely get it, and you should use your rights to protest. But, the moment you start vandalising and damaging property you lose your argument. Mainly because all it does is reinforce the points of the people you’re protesting against.
BeastMidlands on
Bullshit story. The only thing they care about is that a statue got chalked up. The reasons they were protesting in the first place? Not that important apparently.
ChaBeezy on
The suffragettes being a repeated target of trans activists is not a good look, and no amount of deleted posts or Reddit down votes will change that.
gapgod2001 on
Huge police presence but no one saw a thing? funny that
BigSneeze0021 on
can someone explain to me what they’re protesting as if im 5? I dont rly know whats up with politics these days
LambertAntiques on
Someone caused public damage in the name of liberation and rights. I cant think of anything the Suffragettes would be more opposed to /s
dpr60 on
The council is responsible for removing graffiti from public spaces, there’s a law against it, you can be charged with criminal damage, even if it’s chalk. If they catch who did it, they’ll probably get a fine to cover the cost of sending a council worker out to clean it off, somewhere around the £100 mark.
People have been caught out before, they think because it’s chalk it’s ok. The courts can be lenient and as far as I can tell they usually are but it’s still possible to get a criminal record for it that would show up on a DBS certificate.
Deadliftdeadlife on
So many comments about it being in chalk (so who cares right) when the very first picture in the article is very clearly in spray paint
Just own it
OdinForce22 on
For fucks sake. This does not help us. There were enough signs. Graffiti wasn’t necessary.
RedBerryyy on
It’s funny, these papers were calling writing an agreeing message supporting human rights on a human rights campaigners statue violent,
Meanwhile, [the times is literally running a double page spread supporting a guy who is straight up, right now going around threatening violence against any trans people he encounters outside](https://bsky.app/profile/hleehurley.com/post/3lnauvzfeoq23)
but god forbid someone do some inoffensive writing in a temporary slightly impolite way on a statue after being essentially labelled a second class citizen by the government for no reason.
10 Comments
Usual stuff with any protest really. I can see where the protest is coming from, I completely get it, and you should use your rights to protest. But, the moment you start vandalising and damaging property you lose your argument. Mainly because all it does is reinforce the points of the people you’re protesting against.
Bullshit story. The only thing they care about is that a statue got chalked up. The reasons they were protesting in the first place? Not that important apparently.
The suffragettes being a repeated target of trans activists is not a good look, and no amount of deleted posts or Reddit down votes will change that.
Huge police presence but no one saw a thing? funny that
can someone explain to me what they’re protesting as if im 5? I dont rly know whats up with politics these days
Someone caused public damage in the name of liberation and rights. I cant think of anything the Suffragettes would be more opposed to /s
The council is responsible for removing graffiti from public spaces, there’s a law against it, you can be charged with criminal damage, even if it’s chalk. If they catch who did it, they’ll probably get a fine to cover the cost of sending a council worker out to clean it off, somewhere around the £100 mark.
People have been caught out before, they think because it’s chalk it’s ok. The courts can be lenient and as far as I can tell they usually are but it’s still possible to get a criminal record for it that would show up on a DBS certificate.
So many comments about it being in chalk (so who cares right) when the very first picture in the article is very clearly in spray paint
Just own it
For fucks sake. This does not help us. There were enough signs. Graffiti wasn’t necessary.
It’s funny, these papers were calling writing an agreeing message supporting human rights on a human rights campaigners statue violent,
Meanwhile, [the times is literally running a double page spread supporting a guy who is straight up, right now going around threatening violence against any trans people he encounters outside](https://bsky.app/profile/hleehurley.com/post/3lnauvzfeoq23)
but god forbid someone do some inoffensive writing in a temporary slightly impolite way on a statue after being essentially labelled a second class citizen by the government for no reason.
edit: clarified it was a different paper