Share.

    19 Comments

    1. Difficult-Egg-5001 on

      Id have thought there would be massive applause for this, great border control.

    2. PinZealousideal1914 on

      Incredibly, can’t stop anybody without a passport but suddenly “freedom of speech” is subject to a passport.

    3. Entire_Bed_1303 on

      It’s worrying that they’re not criminals and wish to express political views but because they don’t align with those of the leadership, they cannot enter the country. It’s a direct stifling of speech without anyone having committed a hate crime or having done anything criminal. It is undemocratic.

    4. Ah, no border security for potential new voters but only for political opponents.

    5. Khan and kier are praying someone kicks off so they can control the narrative and give the plod a reason to arrest people. Hes basically calling everyone racist again.

    6. I’m very uncomfortable with this goverment banning people from entering purely because of their political views, for this legal rally tomorrow, especially if they haven’t committed crimes. That feels difficult to reconcile with the UK’s stated support for freedom of speech and movement.

      (Im not supporting or against the rally) im completely neutral here

    7. Trundlenator on

      I approve of this but it does come with the side effect that these people are being more publicised than if they’d been allowed in and been at the rally.

    8. ClassicCurious3823 on

      What a joke. Ban legitimate speakers but leave the door open for rapists and murderers. Some free speech.

    9. TangerineLogical9779 on

      Ahh lovely, far right agitators are banned

      Ex Al-Qaeda members on the other hand, given the red carpet and a firm hand shake

    10. Extremely interesting how people hate foreign propagandists influencing the voting populace of this country on social media, etc, but the act of blocking them from coming here to do it in person makes some people uncomfortable

    11. Ninevehenian on

      *Breivik’s writings mention the English Defence League, claiming that he had contact with senior members of the EDL, and that a Norwegian version of the group was “in the process of gaining strength”.*

      It may be quite good that forreign hatepreachers don’t cooperate too much with Mr. Robinson.

    12. Any_Association405 on

      Should have nipped it in the bud before the genie was out of the bottle 

    13. FestivalRampage on

      They should have entered by small boat and we’d have given them a hotel for free

    14. Murdock-275 on

      Can’t argue if they are literally inciting violence, but this seems to be another clear case of 2 tier Britain considering ahmed al fattah, who fantasised about using nuclear weapons on white people was welcomed into the country with open arms by Starmer, as a “top priority” for his government.

      From the article, el fattah’s extreme and  racially-violent fantasies and outpourings targeting the British, police, white people etc seem far, FAR worse and a more obvious clear and present danger to native Brits. Especially given that native Brits are by orders of magnitude more likely to be on the receiving end of racially and religiously motivated hate / terror killings than dishing them out.

      Strange case of extreme and dangerous double standards. Expected from Starmer and Labour though.

    15. One-Positive309 on

      I thought it said “far left alligators”, couldn’t understand how anyone knew the political opinions of reptiles !

    16. SlaveToNoTrend on

      Agitators banned but Alqaeda welcomed in to downing street.
      Feels like the tv series enemy within.

    17. If you want to come here to raise funds and host “understanding hamas” events that’s cool though

    18. Mrbrownlove on

      Read that as Elven. I prefer the real version but elves are pretty much the aryan race so it works either way.